You have been lied to. We all have been lied to. The American history textbooks and professors are deceiving you; they don’t give you all the facts. We all must remember something: the winners in history write the textbooks, they are not objective. If you want the true story of history, then you have to search it out for yourself. One such lie of the textbooks is the claim that Columbus made the first voyage of significance to America. (Only recently did they concede that the Vikings made it “first,” but they claim it made no impact on the World at large. )
There is monumental evidence that shows there was transatlantic trade well before Columbus or even well before Christ. There are petroglyphs, languages, pottery, stone tablets, old mines, and other artifacts that point to American contact well into antiquity. The expert epigrapher Barry Fell has written extensively about all of these artifacts in his hundreds of articles and his 3 books America B.C., Saga America, and Bronze Age America. Regretfully, I can only include a tiny fraction of the evidence that can be found in his works.
America’s Bronze Mines
To start, let’s go all the way back to the Bronze Age. One of the two metals required to make bronze is copper. Europe must have needed many tons of copper to satisfy it’s hefty appetite for bronze. For example, imagine how many bronze chisels would have been needed to construct the Great Pyramid or how much bronze would be needed to make all the armor and weapons for the Roman army. However, Europe is not rich in copper deposits. So, where did all the copper come from? The answer lies all the way on the other side of the Atlantic.
In the state of Michigan up on Lake Superior many ancient copper mines have been discovered. There are miles and miles of trenches and evidence of ancient copper mining. In one of the mines a large copper rich boulder propped up on petrified wooden scaffolding was discovered. The scaffolding was carbon dated and it was found that it originated from the time period of the Bronze Age. Coincidence? I think not. Massive quantities of copper were excavated from the ancient mines in Michigan, but there is no evidence of the copper being melted down and forged into goods there. So, where did all the copper ore go?
Over in Europe an ancient shipwreck (the Uluburun shipwreck) was discovered and it had 10 tons of copper ingots sealed with it in the depths. These copper ingots were remarkably pure, consisting of 99.5% pure copper. Copper this pure could not be found in Europe. However, it could be found in Michigan because of the unique geological conditions there. Pure copper could be found there in vast quantities.
The Uluburun ship was most likely an ancient merchant vessel returning from a voyage to North America with 10 tons of copper from the mines in Michigan. If not, where did all the copper mined in Michigan go? Is it just a wild coincidence that the Michigan copper was being mined at exactly the same time as the Bronze Age in Europe? And how was the Uluburun copper almost completely pure?
The Miꞌkmaq Indian Hieroglyphics
Another shocking example of Pre-Columbian contact in the new world are the Mi’kmaq Indian Hieroglyphics. The Mi’kmaq Indians were primarily native to the Canadian provinces of Nova Scotia, New Brunswick, and Newfoundland. The writing system for their language was a series of hieroglyphics that show some striking similarities to Egyptian hieroglyphics. Both civilizations have many hieroglyphics that look identical, or close to it, and they have the same meaning. You can see a handful of the hieroglyphics pictured below. The Mi’kmaq hieroglyphics are on the left and the corresponding Egyptian hieroglyphics are on the right. (Please note the picture is in Italian.)
As you can see, the hieroglyphics pictured above are all similar and one of them is even identical. How likely is it for 2 civilizations to develop hieroglyphics with very similar shapes and meanings completely independent of one another? It is not very likely. Could it be that ancient Egyptians had contact with the ancestors of the Mi’kmaq Indians? That would definitely make the similarities in their writing systems make a whole lot more sense.
Why Are They Lying About It
It is pretty obvious, especially if you read Barry Fell’s works, that the American historical establishment has been lying about Columbus. But, the question is: why? I think it is because they want to support the belief in cultural evolutionism. This is the view that society has always been advancing culturally/technologically. They want us to think that ancient people were backwards and stupid to discourage us from studying the lessons of history.
The cycles of history have much to teach especially about government. They want us to forget the lessons of our ancestors. This is especially true in the United States where we have fallen so far from the Founding Father’s visions of freedom. If we are ignorant of the consequences of government intervention/control in the past, then we are doomed to repeat them. And the idea of cultural evolution is helping them take us back into the past to relive the slavery that is to come from increasing government control. We are forgetting the crucial lessons of freedom we have learned over millennia.
Conclusion
The American historical establishment is clearly lying to the public. There is massive evidence that there was contact with the New World in ancient times. However, the mainstream American historical establishment will not even acknowledge it. They know if they do it will uncover their lies about Columbus being first because they can not refute all the evidence. These lies help them spread their idea of cultural evolutionism, which will hasten the coming of an absolutist state.
If they have been lying about this, then what other historical events are shrouded in their lies? There are many events in American History that they could be trying to cover up. Luckily, with the coming of the internet it is becoming harder and harder for them to maintain their lies and sooner or later the public will realize that these people are not worthy of their trust.
Liars